Strange Stability: How Cold War Scientists Set Out to Control the Arms Race and Ended Up Serving the Military-Industrial...

— —

Benjamin Wilson

Strange Stability

How Cold War Scientists Set Out to Control the Arms Race and Ended Up Serving the Military-Industrial...

Benjamin Wilson

$86.95

Hardback

Forthcoming
Pre-Order now

QTY:

English

Harvard University Press
18 November 2025

Arms negotiation & control; Nuclear weapons; History of science

An eye-opening reconsideration of the Cold War arms control movement, showing how scientists who presented themselves as independent-minded opponents of the arms race in fact functioned as agents of the military-industrial complex that profited from it.

Do scientists speak truth to power? During the Cold War, a group of elite American strategists and science advisors claimed to do precisely that. Styling themselves as figures of rationality and restraint, they insisted that mutual assured destruction was the natural logic of the atomic age: as long as nuclear deterrence was credible, no one would ever shoot first. This doctrine, known as ""strategic stability,"" became the foundation of the arms control movement, earning its promoters widespread admiration as independent thinkers and steadfast peacemakers. But in this crucial counterhistory, Benjamin Wilson shows that we have misunderstood them and their efforts. Arms controllers, he reveals, worked not to restrain the nuclear arms race but to marginalize more radical approaches to disarmament.

As Wilson makes clear, strategic stability was never the objective condition the analysts presented it as. It was a flexible, contested metaphor based on ideas from physics, economics, and cybernetics, capable of justifying a wide range of policies. Yet the advisors insisted on one upshot above all: constant military research and development and the continuous upgrading of America's strategic arsenal. That these policies benefited the military-industrial complex is no surprise, since many arms control thinkers were creatures of the Pentagon and corporate defense contractors. Some even spoke out against missile development in public while backing lavish funding behind closed doors.

Strange Stability powerfully corrects decades of mythmaking surrounding arms control. At the same time, Wilson offers a sobering reflection on the dream of technocratic restraint. The well-placed insider who resists powerful institutions is an enticing character, but more fictional than real.

By: Benjamin Wilson
Imprint: Harvard University Press
Country of Publication: United States
Dimensions: Height: 235mm, Width: 156mm,
ISBN: 9780674976085
ISBN 10: 0674976088
Pages: 464
Publication Date: 18 November 2025
Audience: Professional and scholarly , College/higher education , Undergraduate , Further / Higher Education
Format: Hardback
Publisher's Status: Forthcoming

Benjamin Wilson is Associate Professor of History of Science at Harvard University.

Reviews for Strange Stability: How Cold War Scientists Set Out to Control the Arms Race and Ended Up Serving the Military-Industrial Complex

Eye-opening... a sharp puncturing of Cold War mythology.-- ""Publishers Weekly"" (10/22/2025 12:00:00 AM) Strange Stability is an immensely important contribution to the history of Cold War science. Benjamin Wilson has written perhaps the first truly historical account of the role of liberal defense scientists in the arms race, arguing that they were effectively co-opted by the defense complex that they ostensibly set out to restrain. This is a solid, well-written, and provocative work of myth-busting scholarship, and a cautionary tale of collaboration and self-deception.--Alex Wellerstein, author of Restricted Data The opaque world of nuclear strategy comes alive in Benjamin Wilson's fascinating Strange Stability. By following the money as well as the science, and by making his case through careful research rather than sensational conspiracy theories, Wilson shows the military-industrial complex in a garish new light. In graceful prose and with a gift for storytelling, he dramatically pulls back the curtain of the national security state.--Andrew Preston, author of Total Defense Benjamin Wilson does something remarkable in Strange Stability. He shows how emerging mavens of nuclear strategy ported over concepts from unrelated fields, then wreathed them with mathematical formulas. Making a 'science' of nuclear deterrence, liberal experts managed to advocate for perpetual investment in research for bigger and better bombs while arguing that those same weapons should never be deployed. Even the peaceniks, Wilson shows, were heavily invested in the military industry.--Kate Brown, author of Plutopia