""Quomodo Concordare Debeant Canones 214 Et 1072"" est tractatus scientificus et iuridicus a G. Arendt scriptus, qui in viscera Codicis Iuris Canonici anni 1917 penetrat. Hoc opus fundamentale intendit ad solvendam difficultatem interpretationis inter duos canones summi momenti: canonem 214, qui de statu clericali et oneribus eius agit, et canonem 1072. Auctor methodo scholastica et subtili utitur ut demonstret quomodo haec praecepta conciliare possint, remoto omni conflictu inter forum externum et forum conscientiae (internum). In his paginis, lector inveniet profundam analysim iurisprudentiae ecclesiasticae, ubi ratio legis et praxis pastoralis conveniunt. G. Arendt argumenta proferre studet quae unitatem iuris canonici conservent et dubitationes iurisperitorum tollant. Hoc volumen non solum est instrumentum utile ad canonistas, sed etiam ad historicos qui evolutionem legum Ecclesiae Catholicae saeculo vicesimo investigant.
Per investigationem de ""Quomodo Concordare Debeant Canones 214 Et 1072"", auctor claritatem affert in quaestionibus ubi ius et obligatio concurrunt. Est opus necessarium pro bibliothecis theologicis et pro iis qui scientiam iuridicam cum cura colunt, praebens visionem claram de harmonia legislativa in contextu Ecclesiae Romanae.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.