Aiko Holvikivi is Assistant Professor of Gender, Peace and Security at the LSE Department of Gender Studies, UK. Her research is interested in transnational movements of knowledges and of people, and how these are produced by and productive of gendered and racialised (in)security. Her book monograph Fixing Gender: The Paradoxical Politics of Training Peacekeepers (forthcoming, Oxford University Press) examines what work the term gender comes to do in the context of international peacekeeping. Her published work appears in journals including Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, European Journal of Politics and Gender, and International Peacekeeping. Billy Holzberg is Assistant Professor (lecturer) in Social Justice at the Centre for Public Policy Research at King’s College London, UK. His research focuses on the affective and sexual politics of intensified nationalisms and border regimes in Europe and has been published in journals like Body and Society, Ethnic and Racial Studies, Feminist Media Studies and Sociology. His first monograph Affective Bordering: The Emotional Politics of Race, Migration and Deservingness published with Manchester University Press conceptualises national border making as an affective practice cementing racialised and gendered hierarchies. Tomás Ojeda is an ESRC Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Brighton’s Centre for Transforming Sexuality and Gender (2022-2023), and Visiting Fellow at the LSE Department of Gender Studies, UK. His research interests lie in the intersection of queer theory, psychosocial studies, anti-gender politics and LGBTI+ mental health, with a special focus on depathologising practices, activist and academic responses to current attacks on gender affirming care. He is an editor of Engenderings, the LSE Gender blog.
“Transnational Anti-Gender Politics: Feminist Solidarity in Times of Global Attack edited by Aiko Holvikivi, Billy Holzberg and Tomás Ojeda is a welcome intervention into the discourse. ... The book is self-aware and cautious, often reflecting on the limitations of applying the anti-gender framework in countries where the terminology does not arise organically. It is a valuable resource in conceptualising anti-gender politics … .” (LSE Review of Books, blogs.lse.ac.uk, February 20, 2025)