Tamás Demeter is Professor of Philosophy at the Corvinus University of Budapest and Senior Research Fellow at the HUN-REN Research Centre for the Humanities, Budapest. He has published widely on David Hume, the connections of Scottish moral and natural philosophy, and the sociology of knowledge in Monist, Synthese, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, History of the Human Sciences, Early Science and Medicine. He has contributed chapters to collections Newton and Empiricism, The Oxford Handbook of Newton, and the forthoming Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, vol. II (all OUP). He is editor of Intellectuals, InstInequalities and Transitions, co-editor of Conflicting Values of Inquiry and (both Brill), and special issues of Synthese on ""The Uses and Abuses of Mathematics in Early Modern Philosophy"" and ""Humeanisms"". He is author of David Hume and the Culture of Scottish Newtonianism (Brill, 2016).
"Social scientists these days often attempt to identify ideal types that can be described by mathematical models. Scottish Enlightenment thinkers, in contrast, have found the foundations of inquiry in ""the experimental method"", in the practice of empirical reasoning that would become the foundation of various social sciences - or as they back in the eighteenth century called them comprehensively: the ""science of human nature"". In their hands, human nature turns out to be the product of society that varies with history, and whose understanding requires imagination and a study of actual processes. This book is recommended to social scientists who intend to go beyond the elegant, but infertile, mathematical modelling of human behaviour.--Ivan Szel�nyi, Yale University The Scottish Enlightenment has been of intense interest for philosophers and the history of economics. It's long overdue to reclaim it for social theory and sociology. This wonderful collection re-introduces and deepens our knowledge of this fertile intellectual period. While the collection displays impeccable historical scholarship, it also re-invites us to return to contemporary social theory with fresh and wiser questions.--Eric Schliesser, University of Amsterdam"