The Metaphysics of the Material World: Suárez, Descartes, Spinoza

— —

Tad M. Schmaltz (Professor of Philosophy and James B. and Grace J. Nelson Fellow, Professor of Philosophy and James B. and Grace J. Nelson Fellow, University of Michigan)

The Metaphysics of the Material World

Suárez, Descartes, Spinoza

Tad M. Schmaltz (Professor of Philosophy and James B. and Grace J. Nelson Fellow, Professor of Philosophy and James B. and Grace J. Nelson Fellow, University of Michigan)

$209

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

Availability Information

We source books from suppliers in Australia and overseas. For books we don't currently have in stock, the time it takes to get them from our suppliers can vary widely - from a few days to a few months - so we check each book with each supplier to determine the expected time it will take to be supplied to us.

We then advise you accordingly. If the time taken to get any book is too long for you, you can let us know and we will cancel or adjust your order, and refund as required.

To find out the anticipated arrival time for specific items prior to ordering, please contact us by phone or email:

Phone +61 2 9264 3111, or 1800 4 BOOKS (1800 4 26657) if outside Sydney:
option 1 Abbey's Bookshop (Crime, History, Science, Kids & more) • info@abbeys.com.au
option 2 Language Book Centre (ESL & Foreign Languages) • language@abbeys.com.au
option 3 Galaxy Bookshop (Sci-fi, Fantasy, Romance, Graphic Novels) • sf@galaxybooks.com.au

QTY:

English

Oxford University Press Inc
18 December 2019

Western philosophy: Medieval & Renaissance, c 500 to c 1600; Western philosophy: c 1600 to c 1900; Philosophy: metaphysics & ontology

"In The Metaphysics of the Material World, Tad M. Schmaltz traces a particular development of the metaphysics of the material world in early modern thought. The route Schmaltz follows derives from a critique of Spinoza in the work of Pierre Bayle. Bayle charged in particular that Spinoza's monistic conception of the material world founders on the account of extension and its ""modes"" and parts that he inherited from Descartes, and that Descartes in turn inherited from late scholasticism, and ultimately from Aristotle. After an initial discussion of Bayle's critique of Spinoza and its relation to Aristotle's distinction between substance and accident, this study starts with the original re-conceptualization of Aristotle's metaphysics of the material world that we find in the work of the early modern scholastic Suárez. What receives particular attention is Suárez's introduction of the ""modal distinction"" and his distinctive account of the Aristotelian accident of ""continuous quantity."" This examination of Suárez is followed by a treatment of the connections of his particular version of the scholastic conception of the material world to the very different conception that Descartes offered. Especially important is Descartes's view of the relation of extended substance both to its modes and to the parts that compose it. Finally, there is a consideration of what these developments in Suárez and Descartes have to teach us about Spinoza's monistic conception of the material world. Of special concern here is to draw on this historical narrative to provide a re-assessment of Bayle's critique of Spinoza."

By: Tad M. Schmaltz (Professor of Philosophy and James B. and Grace J. Nelson Fellow Professor of Philosophy and James B. and Grace J. Nelson Fellow University of Michigan)
Imprint: Oxford University Press Inc
Country of Publication: United States
Dimensions: Height: 160mm, Width: 236mm, Spine: 31mm
Weight: 1g
ISBN: 9780190070229
ISBN 10: 0190070226
Pages: 312
Publication Date: 18 December 2019
Audience: Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate
Format: Hardback
Publisher's Status: Active

Tables and Figures Abbreviations Acknowledgements Prologue 1. Bayle's Narrative 1.1. Bayle's Aristotelian Critique of Spinoza 1.2. Aristotle's Metaphysics of the Material World Part I: Suárez 2. Metaphysics and Material Modes 2.1. Analogical Metaphysics 2.2. Theory of Distinctions I 2.3. The Metaphysics of Material Modes 3. Quantity, Integral Parts and Boundaries 3.1. Quantity and Impenetrability I 3.2. Mereology and Integral Parts 3.3. Boundaries as Indivisible Constituents Part II: Descartes 4. Metaphysical Themes from Suárez 4.1. Theory of Distinctions II 4.2. Quantity and Impenetrability II 4.3. The Metaphysics of Surfaces 5. Material Pluralism and Ordinary Bodies 5.1. The Synopsis and Bodies-Taken-In-General 5.2. Incorruptibility and the Vacuum 5.3. Ordinary Bodies, Human and Otherwise Part III: Spinoza 6. Metaphysical Themes from Descartes 6.1. The Nature of Substance/Attributes 6.2. The Nature of Modes 6.3. From Extension to Motion-and-Rest 7. Material Monism and Bodily Parts 7.1. Modal Parts and Divisible Quantity 7.2. The Mereology of the Infinite Individual 7.3. Parts, Modes and Material Monism Epilogue Works cited Index

Tad M. Schmaltz is Professor of Philosophy and James B. and Grace J. Nelson Fellow at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He specializes in early modern philosophy, and is the author of Malebranche's Theory of the Soul (OUP 1996), Radical Cartesianism (2002), Descartes on Causation (OUP 2008), and Early Modern Cartesianisms (OUP 2017). In addition, he has edited or co-edited Receptions of Descartes (2005), Integrating History and Philosophy of Science (2012), Efficient Causation: A History (OUP 2014), The Historical Dictionary of Descartes and Cartesian Philosophy (2015), The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy (OUP 2017), and The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism (OUP 2019).

Reviews for The Metaphysics of the Material World: Suárez, Descartes, Spinoza

This is a very strong, important addition to the literature. The literature on Descartes is huge and the literature on Spinoza is expanding at breakneck speed. But Tad Schmaltz offers something very distinctive: a consideration of their views on the metaphysics of body in relation to Francisco Suarez. While recent scholarship has taken Suarez into account in analysis of Descartes, the depth of Schmaltz' analysis is unusual and unearths novel, very interesting material...Furthermore, Schmaltz takes the interesting approach of coming to this material from Pierre Bayle's objections to Spinoza. His book offers in-depth and thoughtful analysis of the material, and its interest goes well beyond its contribution to the literature on the three figures in question: its treatment of the metaphysics of body contains ideas and insights that will be very useful in approaching other early modern thinkers. -Marleen Rozemond, Department of Philosophy, University of Toronto This is an incredibly rich book, full of important ideas about how to understand Suarez, Descartes, and Spinoza. It will be influential on scholars working on all three figures, and it makes an important contribution to the ongoing project of trying to understand seventeenth century philosophy better in the light of prior scholastic material. -Robert Pasnau, Department of Philosophy, University of Colorado