Joann Fletcher, Ph.D., lectures at the University of York and is Egyptologist for Harrogate Museums and Arts. Archaeology writer forThe Guardian, she has received acclaim for her TV documentaries. Previous publications includeAncient Egypt(Watkins, 1999) andEgypt's Sun King(Watkins, 2000).
Showing how social-choice theory and game theory could make political and social institutions more democratic, Brams uses mathematical analysis to develop new procedures that could enable voters to better express their preferences. Times Higher Education The image on the cover of Mathematics and Democracy shows four people pulling on two ropes. If they all pull, the knot will jam. The book's contents show, on the contrary, that sometimes mathematics and game theory can unjam the problems of voting. -- Iain McLean Science In seven chapters, Brams proposes and dissects a range of, often very elegant, fair division procedures pertaining to different situations... Brams strengthens his arguments with a wealth of real-life examples, from US elections to the 1978 peace negotiations between Israel and Egypt. The mathematical results are amply illustrated with easy-to-follow examples... If you're interested in democracy, then this book makes eye-opening reading, and if you're planning on wielding power at some point in the future, then it should be compulsory! ianne Freiberger, + Plus Magazine Mathematics and Democracy is rich in analyses of historical cases... Read Mathematics and Democracy: You will learn of the vast number of voting options that have been mooted, and you will easily conclude that any proposed change, however minor, will arouse fury in some constituency somewhere. -- Philip J. Davis SIAM News Increasingly, mathematicians are finding interesting problems in social science, a development that the previous books of Steven J. Brams helped to catalyze. Mathematics and Democracy, based on a selection of Brams's (mostly co-authored) papers, will add to his influence. -- D. Marc Kilgour Mathematical Reviews Since the math is elementary and the problems familiar, the book can be read both by political scientists not allergic to formal reasoning and by amateurs of mathematics interested in politics. Voting practitioners and designers will be delighted to find thorough discussions of less-known methods. All of them will find the book an interesting introduction to the fascinating subfield of mathematically oriented political science that analyzes and invents constructive institutional solutions to social dilemmas. -- Marek Kaminski Political Science Quarterly