Success and Failure of Countries at the Olympic Games

It turns out that good public policy is key, says Danyel Reiche, who has written a book to try to explain the secrets of Olympic success. He asks, for instance, why Kenya is able to win 29 times as many medals as Saudi Arabia, though it is 17 times poorer. His answer is a policy formula that he terms WISE, which breaks down into four areas: empower women in order to unlock the potential of half the population; build strong sports institutions in the country; specialize in some sports; and become an early adopter of new techniques and sports. - Fareed Zakaria, Washington Post In short, success at the Rio Olympics isn't correlated with much of anything that people use to judge countries. Rather, as the social scientist Danyel Reiche has asserted, it probably has a lot more to do with how countries choose to allocate resources. - Mark Whitehouse, Bloomberg Today the Soviet bloc may have dissolved, but its centrally-planned approach to sports endures: As political scientist Danyel Reiche argues in his new book Success and Failure of Countries at the Olympics (2016, Routledge), top athletes around the world now benefit from policies pioneered by communist states, half a century ago. - Selina Cheng, Quartz Danyel Reiche, associate professor of comparative politics at the American University of Beirut, said wealth and size don't determine the Olympic success of a country. He cited the poor performance of India despite a population of 1.3 billion and the exceptional performance of Kenya despite a modest economy. In his book Success and Failure of Countries at the Olympic Games, Reiche proposed the WISE formula to perform at a high level. Reiche said WISE stands for promoting Women in sports, Institutionalizing national sports promotion, Specializing in particularly promising sports and Early adoption of sporting trends as newly added disciplines. - Joaquin M. Henson, The Philippine Star Danyel Reiche, Associate Professor of Comparative Politics at the American University in Beirut, Lebanon, has noted in his book, Success and Failure of Countries at the Olympic Games, that there are several other reasons behind the decrease in the dominance of the traditional medal winners from North America and Europe. One is the inclusion of sports like judo, table tennis and badminton where Asian countries are powerhouses. Rule changes in some sports like boxing and judo, which restrict each country to entering only one athlete, have also helped ensure that winners come from different countries. - Ragini Bhuyan, Live Mint In his recent book Success and Failure of Countries at the Olympic Games, Danyel Reiche points to a study that suggests once governments identify elite sport success as a policy objective they are locked onto a path from which it is increasingly difficult to deviate . - Owen Gibson, The Guardian Altogether, the book is well-structured, well-written and based on solid knowledge and research...Success and Failure of Countries at the Olympic Games is an excellent introduction which seems especially recommendable for practitioners and for scholars who are new to the field. - Jan Haut, International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics Reiches production provides researchers with such ambitions a base to stand on in further explorations of the subject and has the advantage of being a systematic and comprehensive analysis of what must be regarded as a particularly complex issue. For this reason, it should be interesting for anyone who has ever wondered why some states are successful in the Olympics and other not ... - Bjorn Sandahl, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm This book is an excellent introductory explanation to the theme of sports success, bringing major considerations about how countries deal with the Olympics, building strategies for their own elite sports to lead this world competition. Moreover, the book is a blueprint to sport historians who can access a variety of tools to evaluate the historical progression of countries in elite sport, dealing with the changes occurring over time . - Silvestre Cirilo, The International Journal of the History of Sport Overall this work is very well written. Reiche supports his points with ample evidence drawn from a wide array of sources, including International Olympic Committee and New York Times statistics and countless current studies of the games...thoughtful work that provides a welcome contribution to the growing field of Olympic studies looking at state involvement. - Erin Redihan, Boston University, Journal of Sport History