This new and revised edition of Peter Kreeft’s Socratic Logic is updated, adding new exercises and more complete examples, all with Kreeft’s characteristic clarity and wit. Since its introduction in the spring of 2004, Socratic Logic has proven to be a different type of logic text:
(1) This is the only complete system of classical Aristotelian logic in print. The “old logic” is still the natural logic of the four language arts (reading, writing, speaking, and listening). Symbolic, or “mathematical,” logic is not for the humanities. (How often have you heard someone argue in symbolic logic?)
(2) This book is simple and user-friendly. It is highly interactive, with a plethora of exercises and a light, engaging style.
(3) It is practical. It is designed for do-it-yourselfers as well as classrooms. It emphasizes topics in proportion to probable student use: e.g., interpreting ordinary language, not only analyzing but also constructing effective arguments, smoking out hidden assumptions, making “argument maps,” and using Socratic method in various circumstances.
(4) It is philosophical. Its exercises expose students to many classical quotations, and additional chapters introduce philosophical issues in a Socratic manner and from a commonsense, realistic point of view. It prepares students for reading Great Books rather than Dick and Jane, and models Socrates as the beginner’s ideal teacher and philosopher.
By:
Peter Kreeft,
Trent Dougherty
Imprint: St Augustine's Press
Country of Publication: United States
Edition: 3rd
Dimensions:
Height: 232mm,
Width: 159mm,
Spine: 27mm
Weight: 708g
ISBN: 9781587318085
ISBN 10: 1587318083
Pages: 410
Publication Date: 15 September 2010
Audience:
Professional and scholarly
,
Undergraduate
Format: Hardback
Publisher's Status: Active
PREFACE ix INTRODUCTION 1 1. What good is logic? 1 2. Seventeen ways this book is different 9 3. The two logics (P)* 15 4. All of logic in two pages: an overview (B)* 26 5. The three acts of the mind (B) 28 I. THE FIRST ACT OF THE MIND: UNDERSTANDING 35 1. Understanding: the thing that distinguishes man from both beast and computer (P) 35 2. Concepts, terms and words (P) 40 3. The “problem of universals” (P) 41 4. The extension and comprehension of terms 43 II. TERMS 47 1. Classifying terms 47 2. Categories (B) 54 3. Predicables (B) 56 4. Division and Outlining (B) 62 III. MATERIAL FALLACIES 68 1. Fallacies of language 71 2. Fallacies of diversion 80 3. Fallacies of oversimplification 86 4, Fallacies of argumentation 92 5. Inductive fallacies 100 6, Procedural fallacies 104 7. Metaphysical fallacies 109 8. Short Story: “Love Is a Fallacy” 114 IV. DEFINITION 123 1. The nature of definition (B) 123 2. The rules of definition (B) 124 3. The kinds of definition 124 4, The limits of definition 129 V. THE SECOND ACT OF THE MIND: JUDGMENT 138 1. Judgments, propositions, and sentences 138 2. What is truth? (P) 143 3. The four kinds of categorical propositions (B) 145 4. Logical form (B) 147 5. Euler’s circles (B) 152 6. Tricky propositions 153 7. The distribution of terms 163 VI. CHANGING PROPOSITIONS 166 1. Immediate inference 166 2. Conversion (B) 167 3. Obversion (B) 170 4. Contraposition 171 VII. CONTRADICTION 173 1. What is contradiction? (B) 173 2. The Square of Opposition (B) 174 3. Existential import (P) 179 4. Tricky propositions on the Square 181 5. Some practical uses of the Square of Opposition 183 VIII. THE THIRD ACT OF THE MIND: REASONING 186 1. What does “reason” mean? (P) 186 2. The ultimate foundations of the syllogism (P) 187 3. How to detect arguments 190 4. Arguments vs. explanations 193 5. Truth and validity 194 IX. DIFFERENT KINDS OF ARGUMENTS 200 1. Three meanings of “because” 200 2. The four causes (P) 202 3. A classification of arguments 205 4. Simple argument maps (B) 206 5. Deductive and Inductive reasoning (B) 210 6. Combining induction and deduction: Socratic method (P) 211 X. SYLLOGISMS 215 1. The structure and strategy of the syllogism (B) 215 2. The skeptic’s objection to the syllogism (P) 219 3. The empiricist’s objection to the syllogism (P) 222 4. Demonstrative syllogisms 230 5. How to construct convincing syllogisms (B) 232 XI. CHECKING SYLLOGISMS FOR VALIDITY 237 1. By Euler’s Circles (B) 237 2. By Aristotle’s six rules (B) 242 3. “Barbara Celarent”: mood and figure 257 4. Venn Diagrams 258 XII. MORE DIFFICULT SYLLOGISMS 264 1. Enthymemes: abbreviated syllogisms (B) 264 2. Sorites: chain syllogisms 275 3. Epicheiremas: multiple syllogisms (B) 279 4. Complex argument maps 282 XIII. COMPOUND SYLLOGISMS 289 1. Hypothetical syllogisms (B) 289 2. “Reductio ad absurdum” arguments 294 3. The practical syllogism: arguing about means and ends 296 4. Disjunctive syllogisms (B) 301 5. Conjunctive syllogisms (B) 303 6. Dilemmas (B) 306 XIV. INDUCTION 313 1. What is induction? 313 2. Generalization 315 3. Causal arguments: Mill’s methods 319 4. Scientific hypotheses 325 5. Statistical probability 328 6. Arguments by analogy 329 7. A fortiori and a minore arguments 335 XV. SOME PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF LOGIC 342 1. How to write a logical essay 342 2. How to write a Socratic dialogue 344 3. How to have a Socratic debate 348 4. How to use Socratic method on difficult people 350 5. How to read a book Socratically 355 XVI. SOME PHILOSOPHICAL APPLICATIONS OF LOGIC 358 1. Logic and theology (P) 358 2. Logic and metaphysics (P) 359 3. Logic and cosmology (P) 360 4. Logic and philosophical anthropology (P) 361 5. Logic and epistemology (P) 362 6. Logic and ethics (P) 362 APPENDIX: PROBLEMS WITH MATHEMATICAL LOGIC 364 1. Basic modern logic 364 2. The paradoxes of material implication 366 3. Responses to the paradoxes of material implication 367 ANSWERS TO EVEN-NUMBERED EXERCISES 370 INDEX OF PRINCIPAL NAMES 400
Peter Kreeft has taught logic at Boston College for thirty years. He is an outstanding speaker and has authored forty or so books in philosophy and theology.
