OUR STORE IS CLOSED ON ANZAC DAY: THURSDAY 25 APRIL

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

Social Service, Private Gain

The Political Economy of Social Impact Bonds

Jesse Hajer John Loxley

$150

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
University of Toronto Press
17 June 2021
"The 2008 financial crisis and its subsequent economic impacts generated a challenge for national and regional governments across the world. From this economic ruin, the Social Impact Bond (SIB) was born as an alternative mechanism for government procurement and delivery of social public services.

Social Service, Private Gain

examines the evolution of SIBs, how they work, their theoretical motivation, and their global proliferation. The book critically assesses the potential of SIBs to constructively contribute to solving the multifaceted social challenges emerging from a context of entrenched and growing inequality. Claiming to bring incremental resources to the rescue, SIBs have taken up disproportionate space with new legislation, policy, subsidies, institutional supports, lobbyists, and ""intermediaries"" facilitating SIBs and thriving on their associated transaction costs. Drawing on mainstream and heterodox economic theory, practical case studies, and empirical data, Jesse Hajer and John Loxley generate new insights based on the limited but still suggestive publicly available data on SIB projects. Challenging the assumptions and narratives put forward by proponents of the model, they offer practical policy recommendations for SIBs and explain what the model tells us about the potential for transformational change for the better."

By:   ,
Imprint:   University of Toronto Press
Country of Publication:   Canada
Dimensions:   Height: 234mm,  Width: 155mm,  Spine: 33mm
Weight:   680g
ISBN:   9781487503284
ISBN 10:   1487503288
Pages:   424
Publication Date:  
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Professional and scholarly ,  Primary ,  Undergraduate
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Preface  Acknowledgements  List of Tables  List of Figures  INTRODUCTION Part A: The Characteristics and Emergence of the Social Impact Bond Model Chapter 1: The Structure of Social Impact Bonds  Introduction  I. Defining SIBs  II. Public versus Private Dimensions in Social Service Provision III. Defining Features of SIBs  IV. Conclusion  Chapter 2: The Short History of SIBs and the Development of the Enabling Field  Introduction  I. The Scale of Impact Bonds by Sector  II. The Distribution of SIBs by Country  III. SIBs Delivering results  IV. Investor returns  V. Conclusion  Part B: Efficiency-Based Explanations of SIB Emergence Chapter 3: The Rationale of SIBs  Introduction  I. Claim 1: SIBs Allow More Social Programs to be Delivered  II. Claim 2: Better programs: Higher quality and greater effectiveness  III. Claim 3: Better system:  IV. Conclusion  Chapter 4: Social Impact Bonds as Public Private Partnerships Introduction  I. Review of the Public Private Partnership (PPP) Infrastructure Delivery Model II. SIBs as Public Private Partnerships III. Economic Theory and Modeling of PPPs and SIBs IV. A Comparative Framework for Evaluating SIBs versus conventional procurement  V. Conclusion Part C: The Political Economy of SIBS Chapter 5: Private Institutional Participants in SIBs Introduction  I. The Institutional Participants in SIBs II. Service Providers: The Significance of the Non-Profit Form  III. Altruism, Intrinsic Motivation and Reciprocity  IV. Implications for SIB Implementation and Design V. Conclusion Chapter 6: Government Introduction  I. Motivations of Government II. Relative Cost Critique III. Theories of the State IV. Implications for SIB Design and Regulation V. Conclusion Chapter 7: The Political Economic Context of SIB Emergence Introduction I. Defining neoliberalism II. Financialization III. Comparative Analysis of SIB Leaders and Followers IV. Side note: The UK Versus the US V. Conclusion Chapter 8: Development Impact Bonds Introduction I. Expanding Enabling Fields  II. Examples of DIBs  III. Other Observations on Existing DIBs  IV. A Closer Look at the Claimed Rationale of Results-Based Aid and its Challenges  V. Are DIBs the Future for Foreign Aid?  VI. DIBs and the Need for Foreign Aid  Chapter 9: Policy Recommendations, Reforms and Alternatives  Introduction  I. Recap of Policy Recommendations  II. The Micro Alternative: Conventional delivery through (re)building state capacity  III. The Macro Alternative: Universalism vs. Individualized Approaches  IV. Conclusion  References  Appendix A Review of Meta-analytical Studies on Common SIB Policy Sectors  Appendix B: Sector Proportion of SIBs, by Country  Appendix C: Reported and Estimated SIB Maximum and Expected Investor Returns  Appendix D: Description of Value for Money Analysis in Applied Public Finance  Appendix E: Social Investment and Entrepreneurship Concepts  Appendix F: Development Impact Bonds

Jesse Hajer is an assistant professor in the Department of Economics and Labour Studies program at the University of Manitoba. John Loxley was a professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Manitoba and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.

Reviews for Social Service, Private Gain: The Political Economy of Social Impact Bonds

"""This book is a serious advance in state-of-the-art research on Social Impact Bonds because of its global focus and critical theoretical perspective. The authors find SIBs do not deliver on their three claims of increasing resources, promoting more efficient and better quality programs, and expanding the social service sector. The 'altruistic' nature of some SIB investors does not improve upon the problems generally found with information and power asymmetries in government contracting.""--Mildred E. Warner, Professor of City and Regional Planning and Global Development, Cornell University ""Social Impact Bonds are one of the latest instantiations of financial innovation and for more than a decade evangelists have been extolling their virtues. Jesse Hajer and John Loxley's comprehensive and systematic assessment of the evidence provides an important and long-overdue corrective.""--David Harvie, Centre for Philosophy and Political Economy, University of Leicester"


See Also