""Rationale of Proximate Cause"" is a seminal work in American jurisprudence, specifically within the realm of tort law. Authored by the influential legal scholar Leon Green, this treatise offers a profound re-examination of one of the most complex and debated concepts in legal history: the doctrine of proximate cause. Green moves beyond the rigid, mechanical tests of his era to propose a more functional and realistic approach to legal liability and negligence.
In this classic text, Green critiques the traditional formulas of causation that often confused courts and students alike. Instead, he introduces what would become a foundational shift toward duty-risk analysis, emphasizing the role of the judge and jury in determining the scope of protection afforded by legal rules. By analyzing case law and legal theory, Green provides a rigorous framework for understanding how responsibility is allocated in civil litigation.
Essential for legal historians, scholars of the American Legal Realism movement, and practitioners of tort law, ""Rationale of Proximate Cause"" remains a cornerstone of legal education. It stands as a testament to Green's intellectual legacy, continuing to influence how modern law perceives the relationship between conduct, injury, and justice.
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you may see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.
This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.
As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
