"This volume explores the many ways in which politics shapes the allegedly nonpartisan judicial system in America, ranging from how judges are selected to the bench to how they rule when they get there.
Each title in the Contemporary Debates series examines the veracity of controversial claims or beliefs surrounding a major political/cultural issue in the United States. Each book gives readers a clear and unbiased understanding of current high-interest issues by informing them about falsehoods, half-truths, and misconceptions—and confirming the factual validity of other assertions—that have gained traction in America's cultural and political discourse.
This volume in the series provides a deeply researched and even-handed account of the relationship between America's judicial branch—which is supposed to view law through a nonpartisan lens—and the sometimes poisonous partisanship that is such a notorious factor in the nation's other two branches of government. Is political combat over judicial nominations worse than ever before? What impact is the politicization of the courts having on public faith in the legitimacy of the courts and our wider political system? Was former Supreme Court justice Sandra Day right when she asserted that ""judicial independence is a bedrock principle of our court system, and we are losing it""? This work will provide insights into all these questions and more."
By:
Helena Silverstein (Lafayette College USA)
Imprint: ABC-CLIO
Country of Publication: United States
Dimensions:
Height: 235mm,
Width: 156mm,
Weight: 454g
ISBN: 9781440878053
ISBN 10: 1440878056
Series: Contemporary Debates
Pages: 224
Publication Date: 18 January 2023
Recommended Age: From 7 to 17 years
Audience:
College/higher education
,
Primary & secondary/elementary & high school
,
Primary
,
Children's (6-12)
Format: Hardback
Publisher's Status: Active
Acknowledgments How to Use This Book 1. Nominations, Confirmations, and Departures of Federal Judges Q1. Are nominations and confirmations to the federal bench based on factors beyond merit? Q2. Do outside organizations influence whom the president nominates to the federal bench? Q3. Do interest groups influence the Supreme Court confirmation process? Q4. Is it unusual for the Senate to reject a Supreme Court nominee? Q5. Was the Senate’s refusal to take action on President Obama’s Supreme Court nomination of Merrick Garland really unprecedented? Q6. Are Supreme Court confirmation hearings a “vapid and hollow charade”? Q7. Is the timing of judicial retirements from the Supreme Court influenced by politics? Q8. Did President Trump’s judicial appointments fundamentally re-make the federal judiciary for decades to come? 2. Judicial Elections to State Courts Q9. Have contested judicial elections become more political over recent decades? Q10. Are nonpartisan judicial elections less political than partisan judicial elections? Q11. Has politicization of judicial retention elections increased? Q12. Does the growth of campaign spending by interest groups affect judicial independence? Q13. Do politicized judicial elections threaten the legitimacy of state courts? 3. Structures Affecting the Courts Q14. Has Congress or the president ever sought to adjust the size of the Supreme Court for political gain? Q15. Can Congress strip the Supreme Court and lower federal courts of their jurisdiction? Q16. Would term limits make the Supreme Court less politicized? Q17. Was the end of the filibuster in federal judicial confirmations a historic rule change? Q18. Is the end of the filibuster in federal judicial confirmations likely to increase polarization on the federal courts? 4. Decisions and Decision Making Q19. Are Supreme Court justices influenced by public opinion? Q20. Do judges’ political attitudes and ideologies influence their legal decisions? Q21. Did the Supreme Court’s “switch in time that saved nine” occur in direct response to external political pressure? Q22. Is the influence of amicus briefs on the Supreme Court growing? Q23. Is the Supreme Court using the “shadow docket” more frequently? 5. Public Perceptions of the Judiciary Q24. Is public faith and confidence in the Supreme Court in decline? Q25. Does the public believe the courts are political and partisan? Q26. Does the public’s perception of the judiciary vary by party affiliation? Q27. Has the judicial philosophy known as “originalism” become dominant in American jurisprudence and accepted by the public? 6. Politicization, Partisanship, and Legitimacy Q28. Were President Trump’s criticisms of the judiciary unusual? Q29. Has the Supreme Court become more partisan? Q30. Is the Supreme Court facing a legitimacy crisis? Subject Index About the Author
Helena Silverstein js Professor and Department Head of Government and Law at Lafayette College, USA.
Reviews for Political Control of America's Courts: Examining the Facts
Uses quantifiable data from authoritative sources as the foundation for examining every issue
