In 1633 the Roman Inquisition condemned Galileo as a suspected heretic for defending the astronomical theory that the earth moves, and implicitly assuming the theological principle that Scripture is not scientific authority. This controversial event has sent ripples down the centuries, embodying the struggle between a thinker who came to be regarded as the Father of Modern Science, and an institution that is both one of the world's greatest religions and most ancient organizations. The trial has been cited both as a clear demonstration of the incompatibility between science and religion, and also a stunning exemplar of rationality, scientific method, and critical thinking.
Much has been written about Galileo's trial, but most works argue from a particular point of view - that of secular science against the Church, or justifying the religious position. Maurice Finocchiaro aims to provide a balanced historical account that draws out the cultural nuances. Unfolding the intriguing narrative of Galileo's trial, he sets it against its contemporary intellectual and philosophical background. In particular, Finocchiaro focuses on the contemporary arguments and evidence for and against the Earth's motion, which were based on astronomical observation, the physics of motion, philosophical principles about the nature of knowledge, and theological principles about the authority and the interpretation of Scripture. Following both sides of the controversy and its far-reaching philosophical impact, Finocchiaro unravels the complex relationship between science and religion, and demonstrates how Galileo came to be recognised as a model of logical reasoning.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro
Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:
10 October 2019
Professional and scholarly
Preface and Acknowledgments 1: Introduction: Avoiding Myths and Muddles 2: When the Earth Stood Still 3: The Copernican Controversy (1543-1609) 4: Re-assessing Copernicanism (1609-1616) 5: The Earlier Inquisition Proceedings (1615-1616) 6: The Dialogue on the Two Chief World Systems (1632) 7: The Inquisition Trial (1632-1633) 8: Becoming a Cultural Icon (1616-2016) 9: Religion vs. Science? 10: A Model of Critical Thinking? 11: Some Final Thoughts Further Reading and Cited Works Notes
Maurice Finocchiaro is a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (B.S., 1964) and of the University of California-Berkeley (Ph.D., 1969); now Distinguished Professor of Philosophy (Emeritus), University of Nevada-Las Vegas. He is the recipient of awards from the National Science Foundation (1976-77 and 1998-2002), the National Endowment for the Humanities (1983-84 and 1992-95), the American Council of Learned Societies (1991-92), the Guggenheim Foundation (1998-99), and the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (2008). His books include Galileo and the Art of Reasoning (1980), Defending Copernicus and Galileo: Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs (2010), Arguments about Arguments (2005), and Meta-argumentation (2013).
Reviews for On Trial For Reason: Science, Religion, and Culture in the Galileo Affair
[A] spirited book. * Jonathan Wright, The Catholic Herald * Finocchiaro does a masterly job of explaining the real issues involved in the trial and how the trial has been interpreted down to the present day. It is a subtle and complex story out of which Galileo emerges with great credit. * The Church of England Newspaper * Finocchiaro [...] undertakes with great care a discussion of the nature of rationality and of Galileo's argumentative techniques ... Combining history and philosophy of science, [he] provides an interpretive key from the point of view of a lay scholar, but always ready to do justice to both sides of the controversy. * Stefano Gattei, Corriere della sera (translated from Italian) * Finocchiaro [...] presents the arguments of Galileo, his supporters and his opponents with lucidity. * Geoffrey Cantor, The Times Higher Education Supplement *