MOTHER'S DAY SPECIALS! SHOW ME MORE

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

More is Less

Why Parties May Deliberately Write Incomplete Contracts

Maija Halonen-Akatwijuka (University of Bristol) Oliver Hart (Harvard University)

$32.95

Paperback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Cambridge University Press
23 May 2024
Why are contracts incomplete? Transaction costs and bounded rationality cannot be a total explanation since states of the world are often describable, foreseeable, and yet are not mentioned in a contract. Asymmetric information theories also have limitations. We offer an explanation based on 'contracts as reference points'. Including a contingency of the form, 'The buyer will require a good in event E', has a benefit and a cost. The benefit is that if E occurs there is less to argue about; the cost is that the additional reference point provided by the outcome in E can hinder (re)negotiation in states outside E. We show that if parties agree about a reasonable division of surplus, an incomplete contract is strictly superior to a contingent contract. If parties have different views about the division of surplus, an incomplete contract can be superior if including a contingency would lead to divergent reference points.
By:   ,
Imprint:   Cambridge University Press
Country of Publication:   United Kingdom
Dimensions:   Height: 228mm,  Width: 151mm,  Spine: 3mm
Weight:   70g
ISBN:   9781009396073
ISBN 10:   1009396072
Series:   Elements in Law, Economics and Politics
Pages:   34
Publication Date:  
Audience:   General/trade ,  ELT Advanced
Format:   Paperback
Publisher's Status:   Active
1. Introduction; 2. The model; 3. Is more less?; 4. Large gains in event; 5. Summary and conclusions; Appendix; References.

See Also