PERHAPS A GIFT VOUCHER FOR MUM?: MOTHER'S DAY

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

$789

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Oxford University Press
21 March 2013
Covering all of the substantive grounds on which a claim may be brought, this definitive new work provides unrivalled analysis and guidance on the law of judicial review.

Written by three experienced practitioners, Judicial Review: Principles and Procedure includes chapters on the most common grounds for bringing a claim, such as procedural fairness and irrationality, but also covers emerging grounds such as delay on the part of public bodies and error of fact. In addition, the authors provide a separate, detailed treatment of areas such as administrative policies and the public sector equality duty.

Each element of this complex area of law is carefully broken down to ensure that answers are always easy to find and, where the law is in doubt, the dispute is concisely stated and the view most likely to be preferred by the courts is expressed.

The book analyses in detail the issues that are likely to arise in practice, with thorough and up-to-date reference to case law throughout. It incorporates the jurisprudence arising out of the Human Rights Act 1998, providing practitioners with a complete yet practical treatment of each relevant topic. The book contains comprehensive coverage of procedural matters in each stage of a claim, from pre-action to costs, and includes a chapter on European Union law from Marie Demetriou QC of Brick Court Chambers, providing a uniquely full treatment of all the issues which might be encountered in practice.

By:   , , , ,
Consultant editor:  
Imprint:   Oxford University Press
Country of Publication:   United Kingdom
Dimensions:   Height: 247mm,  Width: 176mm,  Spine: 61mm
Weight:   1.920kg
ISBN:   9780199545094
ISBN 10:   019954509X
Pages:   1056
Publication Date:  
Audience:   College/higher education ,  Further / Higher Education
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active

All three authors have extensive experience of acting in judicial review claims in the Administrative Court and appellate courts, and in public law matters in the European Courts. All are members of the Attorney-General's Panels of Counsel and other related government panels. Jonathan Auburn is the author of Legal Professional Privilege (Hart, 2000) and a contributor to Phipson on Evidence (Sweet and Maxwell, 2009), The White Book on Civil Procedure, Atkins Court Forms: Disclosure (LexisNexis, 2011), Halsbury's Laws of England, Local Government volume (LexisNexis, 2000), and Education and the Courts (Jordans, 2012). Jonathan is a member of the executive committee of The Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association. Jonathan Moffett is the editor of Atkins Court Forms: Administrative Court (LexisNexis, 2007) and a contributor to Halsbury's Laws of England, Local Government volume (LexisNexis, 2000), The New Oxford Companion to Law (OUP, 2008), and Education and the Courts (Jordans, 2012). Andrew Sharland is co-author of Media Law and Human Rights (OUP 2009) and contributor to Education and the Courts (Jordans, 2012), Atkins Court Forms: Human Rights (LexisNexis, 2006), and Information Rights (Sweet and Maxwell, 2007).

Reviews for Judicial Review: Principles and Procedure

Judicial Review: Principles and Procedure is the focused, concise, but comprehensive textbook that public lawyers will want and value in day to day practice Richard Clayton QC, 4-5 Gray's Inn Square This is a concise but highly comprehensive and up to date account of the law relating to judicial review. It will certainly now be my first port of call for public law problems Nigel Giffin QC, 11kbw This is a masterly work. Beautifully and clearly set out, succint and accurate in its content, and perceptive in its analysis. I predict that it will become the front-runner in its field Robert Jay QC, Thirty-Nine Essex Street Chambers


See Also