How Can So Many Be Wrong?

Making the Due Process Case for an Eyewitness Expert

Margaret A. Hagen, Sou Hee (Sophie) Yang

$74.99

Paperback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

Availability Information

We source books from suppliers in Australia and overseas. For books we don't currently have in stock, the time it takes to get them from our suppliers can vary widely - from a few days to a few months - so we check each book with each supplier to determine the expected time it will take to be supplied to us.

We then advise you accordingly. If the time taken to get any book is too long for you, you can let us know and we will cancel or adjust your order, and refund as required.

To find out the anticipated arrival time for specific items prior to ordering, please contact us by phone or email:

Phone +61 2 9264 3111, or 1800 4 BOOKS (1800 4 26657) if outside Sydney:
option 1 Abbey's Bookshop (Crime, History, Science, Kids & more) • info@abbeys.com.au
option 2 Language Book Centre (ESL & Foreign Languages) • language@abbeys.com.au
option 3 Galaxy Bookshop (Sci-fi, Fantasy, Romance, Graphic Novels) • sf@galaxybooks.com.au

QTY:

English

Lexington Books
11 November 2020

Central government; Civil procedure, litigation & dispute resolution; Civil procedure: law of evidence

Of the 347 U.S. false criminal convictions overturned so far through DNA testing, 73 percent were based on erroneous eyewitness testimony. How could so many eyewitnesses be wrong? This book answers this question. The analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court eyewitness cases shows that most of the Court’s holdings were likely in error. The Court—like the judges and juries in the courts below—greatly overestimated the reliability of eyewitnesses against the defendants and decided their convictions based on unsound evidence. The facts of the cases and personalities of the defendants are engaging and compelling. An expert is needed to inform the judge and the jury of the circumstances to consider when weighing the testimony of the witness against the facts of the case. It is a clear violation of Due Process to deny the defendant the provision of an expert witness in all cases where the eyewitness testimony lacks corroboration. Research assessing both cross-examination and jury instructions makes it abundantly clear that neither can effectively provide courts with the counterintuitive information necessary to evaluate eyewitness reliability: denial of an expert is denial of Due Process.

By: Margaret A. Hagen, Sou Hee (Sophie) Yang
Imprint: Lexington Books
Country of Publication: United States
Dimensions: Height: 220mm, Width: 154mm, Spine: 14mm
Weight: 340g
ISBN: 9781498579896
ISBN 10: 1498579892
Pages: 256
Publication Date: 11 November 2020
Audience: Professional and scholarly , Undergraduate
Format: Paperback
Publisher's Status: Active

Chapter 1 Experts In Eyewitness Cases…And The Alternatives Chapter 2 What The Triers Of Fact Must Understand Chapter 3 Supreme Court As Psychologists…Blinded to Science Chapter 4 Attorneys as Psychologists: Perry v. New Hampshire Chapter 5 Jurors as Psychologists Chapter 6 Psychologists as Psychologists: Expert Testimony to Rectify Deficits in Jury Knowledge Chapter 7 How to Make Expert Testimony Most Effective

Margaret A. Hagen is professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at Boston University. Sou Hee Yang holds a J.D. from Columbia Law School.

Reviews for How Can So Many Be Wrong?: Making the Due Process Case for an Eyewitness Expert

Hagen and Yang offer a thoughtful overview of the state of scientific research on threats to eyewitness reliability, the weaknesses of traditional legal safeguards designed to reduce erroneous convictions in eyewitness cases, and the manner in which expert psychological testimony can help reduce those errors. The authors cleverly reconsider the facts of leading Supreme Court eyewitness cases to demonstrate how attention to scientific research would have enriched the Court's analysis and decision making - a treat for lawyers and judges as well as researchers. -- Steven Penrod, John Jay College of Criminal Justice Both ordinary jurors and the United States Supreme Court are woefully ignorant of the real perils of eyewitness testimony, as the authors' thorough review of the latest research and the case law demonstrates. How Can So Many Be Wrong? ably provides all the elements, both scientific and legal, that trial lawyers need to make a powerful case that expert testimony is required to ensure a fair trial in cases that depend on eyewitness identification. -- Michael Avery, President, National Police Accountability Project