Beat the rise! Delivery fees are going up soon.

Close Notification

Your cart does not contain any items

Federal Impartiality

Navigating Divisive Rights in the EU and the US

Mohamed Moussa (University of Cambridge, UK)

$180

Hardback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

QTY:

English
Hart Publishing
28 May 2026
Disagreements on constitutional rights (such as racial and religious discrimination or abortion) are increasingly divisive. From the role of abortion in US presidential elections to debates about the competence creep of EU fundamental rights, the question arises: should the power to decide these matters rest with a central/federal union, or be left to individual states?

This book addresses this crucial federal boundary question from both theoretical and comparative perspectives. It explores how the proper allocation of decision-making power in federal systems can enhance impartiality and reduce polarisation.

The book both develops and critiques the influential constitutional theory of James Madison, architect of the US Constitution and modern federalism. By tracing Madison’s intellectual debt to David Hume and to common law rules on bias, it identifies gaps in his account of impartiality. It also shows how a revised Madisonian framework remains relevant to contemporary struggles in both the US and the EU over managing discord through federal structures.

The book’s comparative dimension explores three categories of rights, each reflecting particular forms of social disagreement: (i) minority rights, which often trigger group bias and spark division between majorities and minorities;(ii) ideologically divisive rights, such as abortion; and (iii) cases where group and ideological bias overlap, such as those pitting religious freedoms against ideologically contested measures, including bans on ritual slaughter or religious apparel in public employment.

By combining comparative and theoretical contributions, the book demonstrates both the perils and the promise of federalism in securing impartiality and navigating social faction.
By:  
Imprint:   Hart Publishing
Country of Publication:   United Kingdom
Dimensions:   Height: 238mm,  Width: 156mm,  Spine: 18mm
Weight:   500g
ISBN:   9781509987283
ISBN 10:   1509987282
Series:   Hart Studies in Comparative Public Law
Pages:   240
Publication Date:  
Audience:   Professional and scholarly ,  College/higher education ,  Undergraduate ,  Primary
Format:   Hardback
Publisher's Status:   Active
Introduction 1. Federal Doctrines and Rights in the EU and US 2. The Theoretical Foundation: The Federal Promise of Impartiality 3. The Possible Impartiality: Minority Rights as A Faction of Interest 4. Non-Pecuniary Bias and the Omission of Factions of Principle 5. The Impossible Impartiality: Abortion as a Faction of Principle 6. Multi-Faceted Factions and the Flexibility of Boundaries: The Case of Religion 7. Conclusions

Mohamed Moussa is Assistant Professor in EU Law, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, UK.

See Also