Environmental Assessment

Volume I: Background and Context of Environmental Assessment 1. Caldwell, L.J., 1988. Environmental impact analysis (EIA): origins, evolution, and future directions. Review of Policy Research, 8 (1): 75-83. 2. Lee, N. and Walsh, F. 1992. Strategic environmental assessment: an overview, Project Appraisal, 7(3): 126-136. 3. Ortolano, L. and Shepherd, A. 1995. Environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment, 13 (1): 3-30. 4. Brown, A. L. and Therivel, R. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3): 183-189. 5. Verheem, R.A.A. and Tonk, J.A.M.N. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: One concept, multiple forms, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3): 177-183. 6. Fischer, T.B. 2001. The practice of environmental assessment for transport and land use policies, plans and programmes, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal, 19(1): 41-51. 7. Rajvanshi, A. 2001. Strategic environmental assessment of the India eco-development project: experiences, prospects and lessons learnt, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(3): 373-393. 8. Vanclay, F. 2004. The triple bottom line and impact assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 6(3): 265-288. 9. Alshuwaikhat, H. M. 2005. Strategic environmental assessment can help solve environmental impact assessment failures in developing countries, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4): 307-317. 10. Vidyarratne, H. 2006. EIA theories and practice: balancing conservation and development in Sri Lanka, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8(2): 205-222. 11. Jay, S.; Jones, C; Slinn, P. and Wood, C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment, retrospect and prospect, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(4): 287-300. 12. Hilding-Rydevik, T. and Bjarnadottir, H. 2007. Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(7): 666-684. 13. Runhaar, H. and Driessen, P.P.J. 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment? The role of context in the contribution of SEA to decision-making, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25(1): 2-14. 14. Koivurova, T. 2008. Transboundary environmental assessment in the Arctic, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26: 265-275. 15. Lam, K.-C.; Chen, J. D. and Wu, J. 2009. Strategic environmental assessment in China: Opportunities, issues and challenges, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(4): 369-385. 16. Sadler, B. 2011.Taking stock of SEA; in: Sadler B., Aschemann, R.; Dusik, J.; Fischer,T. B.; Partidario, M. and Verheem R. (eds). Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment, Earthscan, London: 1-18. 17. Fischer, T.B. and Onyango, V. 2012. SEA related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(4): 253-263. 18. Morgan, R. K. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1): 5-14. Volume II: Environmental Assessment Theory 19. Bartlett, R.V. and Kurian, P.A. 1999. The theory of environmental impact assessment: implicit models of policy-making, Policy and Politics, 27 (4): 415-433. 20. Noble, B. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment: What is it? What makes it strategic? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2(2): 203-224 21. Clark, R. 2000. Making EIA count in decision making, in: Partidario, M. Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment, Lewis Publishers: 15-28. 22. Kornov, L. and Thissen, W.A.H. 2000. Rationality in decision- and policy-making: Implications for strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18(3): 191-200. 23. Nielsson, M. N. and Dalkmann, H. 2001. Decision making and strategic environmental assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 3(3): 305-328. 24. Dovers, S. 2002. Too deep and SEA? Strategic environmental assessment in the era of sustainability; in: Marsden, S. and Dovers, S. (eds.) SEA in Australasia, Sydney Place Federation Press: 24-46. 25. Fischer, T.B. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(2): 155-170. 26. Wilkins, H. 2003. The need for subjectivity in EIA: Discourse as a tool for sustainable development, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(4): 401-414. 27. Cashmore, M. 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: Process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24(3): 403-426. 28. Pope, J.; Annandale, D. and Morrison-Saunders, A. 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24 (6): 595-616. 29. Morrison-Saunders, A. und Fischer, T.B. 2006. What is wrong with EIA and SEA anyway? - A Sceptic's Perspective on Sustainability Assessment, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8(1): 19-39. 30. Kidd, S. and Fischer, T.B. 2007. Towards sustainability: Is integrated appraisal a step in the right direction?, Environment and Planning C, 25(2): 233-249. 31. Sinclair, A.J., Diduck, A. and Fitzpatrick, P. 2008. Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: Critical reflections on 15 years of research, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28: 415-428. 32. Retief, F. 2010. The evolution of environmental assessment debates: critical perspectives from South Africa, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 12 (4): 375-397. 33. Weston, J. 2010. EIA theories - all Chinese whispers and no critical theory, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 12 (4): 357-374. 34. Kornov, L.; Lyhne, I.; Larsen, S. V. and Hansen, A. M. 2011. Change agents in the field of strategic environmental assessment - what does it involve and what potential does it have for research and practice?, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(2): 203-228. 35. Richardson, T. and Cashmore, M. 2012. Power, knowledge and environmental assessment: the World Bank's pursuit of 'good governance', Journal of Political Power, 4(1): 105-125. 36. Tajima, R. and Fischer, T. B. 2013. Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from English spatial planning, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 41: 29-37. Volume III: Methodological aspects of Environmental Assessment 37. Weston, J. 2000. EIA, Decision-making Theory and Screening and Scoping in UK Practice, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43:2, 185-203. 38. Enserink, B. 2000. A quick scan for infrastructure planning: screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18 (1): 15-22. 39. Tukker, A. 2000. Life cycle assessment as a tool in environmental impact assessment, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(4): 435-456. 40. Marshall, R. 2001. Application of mitigation and its resolution within environmental impact assessment: An industrial perspective, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(3): 195-204. 41. Rossouw, N. 2003. A Review of Methods and Generic Criteria for Determining Impact Significance, African Journal of Environmental Assessment and Management, 6: 44-61. 42. Petts, J. 2003. Barriers to deliberative participation in EIA: learning from waste policies, plans and projects, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5 (3): 269-293. 43. Stein, W.; Gerlach, J. and Tomlinson, P. 2004. SEA in transport planning in Germany; in: : Schmidt M, Joao E and Albrecht E (eds), Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment, Springer-Verlag: 585-597. 44. Treweek, J.; Therivel, R .; Thompson, S. and Slater, M. 2005. Principles for the use of strategic environmental assessment as a tool for promoting the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 7 (2): 173-199. 45. Partidario M. R. and Arts, J. 2005. Exploring the concept of strategic environmental assessment follow-up, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(3): 246-257. 46. Hacking, T. and Guthrie, P. 2006. Sustainable development objectives in impact assessment: Why are they needed and where do they come from? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 8(3): 341-371. 47. Duinker, P.N. and Greig, L.A. 2007. Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: improving explorations of the future, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(3): 206-219. 48.Gunn, J. H. and Noble, B. F. 2009. Integrating cumulative effects in regional strategic environmental assessment frameworks: Lessons from practice, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(3): 267-290. 49. Pinho, P.; McCallum, S.; and Santos Cruz, S. 2010. A critical appraisal of EIA screening practice in EU Member States, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 28 (2): 91-107. 50. Nadeem, O. and Fischer, T.B. 2011. 'An Evaluation Framework for Effective Public Participation in EIA in Pakistan', Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31(1): 36-47. 51. Gonzalez Del Campo, A. 2012. GIS in environmental assessment - a review of current issues and future needs, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(1): 1250007. 52. Noble, B. F.; Gunn, J. and Martin, J.2012. Survey of current methods and guidance for strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(3): 139-147. 53. Fischer, T. B. 2012. Identifying shortcomings of SEA practice, Town and Country Planning 81 (6): 281-286. Volume IV: Environmental Assessment effectiveness 54. Ten Heuvelhof, E. and Nauta, C. 1997. The effects of environmental impact assessment in the Netherlands, Project Appraisal, 12(1), 25-30. 55. Marsden, S. 1998. Importance of Context in measuring the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 16(4): 255-266. 56. Emmelin, L. 1998. Evaluating environmental impact assessment systems-Part 1: theoretical and methodological considerations. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15: 129-148. 57. Emmelin, L. 1998. Evaluating environmental impact assessment systems-Part 2: Professional Culture as an aid in understanding implementation. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15: 187-209. 58. Wood, C. 1999. Comparative evaluation of environmental impact assessment systems, in: Petts, J. Handbook of EIA: Volume 2: Impact and Limitations, Wiley, 10-34. 59. Glasson, J. 1999. The First 10 Years of UK EIA System: Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, Planning Theory and Practice, 14(3): 363-375. 60. Fischer, T.B. 2002. SEA performance criteria - the same requirements for every assessment? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 4(1): 83-99. 61. Cashmore, M.; Gwilliam, R.; Morgan, R.; Cobb, D. and Bond, A. 2004. The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22 (4): 295-310. 62. Ortolano, L. and May, C. L. 2004. Appraising effects of mitigation measures: the Grand Coulee Dam's Impacts on Fisheries; in: Arts, J. and Morrison-Saunders, A. (eds.). Follow-up in Environmental Assessment, Earthscan, London: 97-117. 63. Fischer, T.B. and Gazzola, P. 2006. SEA good practice elements and performance criteria - equally valid in all countries? - the case of Italy, Environment Impact Assessment Review, 26(4): 396-409. 64. Retief, F. 2007. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in South Africa, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management,9(1):38-101. 65. Runhaar, H.A.C. and Driessen, P.P.J. 2007. What makes strategic environmental assessment successful environmental assessment?, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25(1): 2-14. 66. Spaling, H. and Vroom, B. 2007. Environmental assessment after the 2004 tsunami: a case study, lessons and prospects, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 25: 43-52. 67. Bina, O. 2008. Context and systems: thinking more broadly about effectiveness in strategic environmental assessment in China, Environmental Management, 42: 717-733. 68. Elling, B., 2009. Rationality and effectiveness: does EIA/SEA treat them as synonyms?, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27 (2): 121-131. 69. Jha-Thakur, U.; Gazzola, P.; Peel, D.; Fischer, T.B. and Kidd, S. 2009. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment - the significance of learning, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(2): 133-144. 70. Stoeglehner, G.; Brown, A.L. and Kornov, L.B. 2009. SEA and planning: ownership of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 27(2): 111-120. 71. Arts, J.; Runhaar, H.; Fischer, T.B.; Jha-Thakur, U.; van Laerhoven, F.; Driessen, P. and Onyango, V. 2012. The Effectiveness of EIA as an Instrument for Environmental Governance - A Comparison of the Netherlands and the UK, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(4): 1250025. 72. Tajima, R.; Gore, T. and Fischer, T. B. 2014. Policy integration between Environmental Assessment and Disaster Management, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 16(3): 450028