Our search has the following Google-type functionality:
If you use '+' at the start of a word, that word will be present in the search results.
eg. Harry +Potter
Search results will contain 'Potter'.
If you use '-' at the start of a word, that word will be absent in the search results.
eg. Harry -Potter
Search results will not contain 'Potter'.
If you use 'AND' between 2 words, then both those words will be present in the search results.
eg. Harry AND Potter
Search results will contain both 'Harry' and 'Potter'.
NOTE: AND will only work with single words not phrases.
If you use 'OR' between 2 single words, then either or both of those words will be present in the search results.
eg. 'Harry OR Potter'
Search results will contain just 'Harry', or just 'Potter', or both 'Harry' and 'Potter'.
NOTE: OR will only work with single words not phrases.
If you use 'NOT' before a word, that word will be absent in the search results. (This is the same as using the minus symbol).
eg. 'Harry NOT Potter'
Search results will not contain 'Potter'.
NOTE: NOT will only work with single words not phrases.
If you use double quotation marks around words, those words will be present in that order.
eg. "Harry Potter"
Search results will contain 'Harry Potter', but not 'Potter Harry'.
NOTE: "" cannot be combined with AND, OR & NOT searches.
If you use '*' in a word, it performs a wildcard search, as it signifies any number of characters. (Searches cannot start with a wildcard).
Search results will contain words starting with 'Pot' and ending in 'er', such as 'Potter'.
Gareth M. Thomas is a Lecturer in Sociology in the School of Social Sciences at Cardiff University. He is a sociologist who is interested in - among other things - medicine, disability, stigma, reproduction, health and well-being, technology, place, and interaction.
'Gareth M. Thomas has produced a thoughtful, rich, nuanced presentation of the normalization of down syndrome screening, hoping to `ignite more reflexive and pluralistic dialogues.' If only that would happen- that more people read, and thought, and spoke about what it means to introduce and make ordinary prenatal screening for more of these predictable conditions. It is an urgent conversation and Thomas has pushed it along in valuable ways'. Barbara Katz Rothman, City University of New York `This fascinating, timely, and highly original book presents a rich ethnographic study of Down's Syndrome (DS) screening in two hospital clinics. With a focus on the routine practices and daily work through which test procedures are managed, risk assessments are communicated, and moral responsibility is assigned, we see how DS screening is simultaneously framed as mundane, low status work and as important to the process of decision-making during a pregnancy. Social interactions between healthcare professionals and expectant parents are central to this process, alongside questions of classification and categorisation, material and spatial architecture, and dramaturgical identity performance. Drawing on medical sociology, symbolic interactionism, and ethnomethodology, Gareth Thomas presents a convincing and compelling argument about how the downgrading of DS screening is routinely accomplished through a network of power relations, discursive accounts, and everyday talk.' - Susie Scott, University of Sussex 'Down's Syndrome Screening and Reproductive Politics takes the reader deep inside the extraordinariness of ordinariness to scrutinize how the professional practices of midwives and sonographers trivialize the tests pregnant women, and their supporters, have for this and other disabling conditions. Based on extensive sociological fieldwork in the U.K., this book provides a valuable analysis of the expert discourses that now inform contemporary reproductive politics, wherever prenatal testing is routinized.' Rayna Rapp, New York University and author of Testing Women, Testing the Foetus: The Social Impact of Amniocentesis in America 'In summary, Down's Syndrome Screening and Reproductive Politics is a clear, thoughtful and measured presentation of Thomas' research. He comes across as a measured researcher and is careful not to overstate his claims as he sets out to demonstrate that screening for Down's syndrome has become a routinised part of pregnancy, is downgraded by professionals in their daily practices and discourse, and that the condition is perceived as a negative pregnancy outcome. This is done succinctly and cogently and will be of interest to scholars and students interested in bioethics, medical sociology, genetics and the ongoing debates in reproductive ethics and politics.' Daniel Rodger, London South Bank University, Review in The New Bioethics