Le Schedule Evaluation Tool (SET) est un outil d’évaluation permettant de mesurer la structure du temps, soit l’horaire imagé dont ont besoin les personnes présentant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme (TSA) ou ayant une déficience intellectuelle (DI). Ces personnes ont généralement un déficit sur le plan des fonctions exécutives et de la mémoire et, par conséquent, ont de la difficulté à s’orienter dans le temps.
Le but du SET est d’aider les intervenantes et les intervenants et les professionelles et les professionnels qui travaillent auprès de ces personnes à déterminer le type d’horaire le plus adapté à leurs besoins et à leurs capacités et de l’implanter dans leur milieu de vie, favorisant ainsi leur autonomie et, conséquemment, une meilleure qualité de vie.
Le SET comprend le matériel, les protocoles et le manuel permettant aux intervenantes et intervenants et aux professionnelles et professionnels d’effectuer l’évaluation de l’horaire auprès des enfants, des adolescents et des adultes fréquentant différents milieux de vie tels que les milieux de garde éducatifs, le milieu scolaire, le milieu de stage ou d’emploi et le milieu résidentiel.
L’outil d’évaluation SET se divise en quatre parties distinctes. La première se réalise par le biais de manipulation d’objets, de photographies, de pictogrammes et de mots dans un contexte d’évaluation formelle. La deuxième et la troisième parties se déroulent directement dans le milieu de vie où il est nécessaire d’implanter l’horaire. La quatrième et dernière partie est administrée sous forme d’entrevue avec l’intervenant connaissant le mieux la personne visée par l’intervention dans le contexte où l’horaire sera introduit.
List of Figures - xi List of Excerpts - xiii Description of Supplementary Material - xv Foreword - xvii Acknowledgements - xix Presentation - A1 The Importance of a Schedule - A2 The SET’s Main Objectives - A3 Target Population - A3 Examiner Training - A3 Evaluating Schedule Characteristics Introduction - A7 The Eight Schedule Characteristics Evaluated Using the SET - A7 Schedule Evaluation Sequence - A8 Required Material - A8 Overview of the Schedule Evaluation Protocol - A9 Symbol Meaning - A10 Information on the Visual Supports Used During the Evaluation - A10 Part 1 - A13 Goal - A13 Duration - A13 Administration - A13 Sequence - A14 1. Prepare the Material for Evaluating Part 1 - A14 2. Identify Where to Start the Evaluation - A15 3. Use the Stop Standards to Identify Which Section or Subsection to Evaluate Next - A15 4. Demonstrations, Evaluation, and Scoring - A16 4.1. Detailed Procedure for 1A Subsections - A21 4.2. Detailed Procedure for 1B Subsections - A23 4.3. Detailed Procedure for 1C Subsections - A29 5. Scoring Part 1 in the Schedule Evaluation Protocol - A36 Part 2 - A45 Goal - A45 Duration - A45 Administration - A45 Sequence - A46 1. Fill in the Required Information in the Schedule Evaluation Protocol - A46 2. Choose the Visual Support Category to Evaluate - A47 3. Determine Where the Matching Boxes Will Be Installed - A47 4. Prepare the Material for Part 2 - A50 5. Prepare the Material for the Visual Support Form to Evaluate - A52 6. Demonstrations, Evaluation, and Scoring - A53 6.1. Detailed Procedure for Visual Support Form 1 - A56 6.2. Detailed Procedure for Visual Support Form 2 - A60 6.3. Detailed Procedure for Visual Support Form 3 - A63 7. Scoring Part 2 of the Evaluation in the Schedule Evaluation Protocol - A66 Part 3 - A71 Goal - A71 Duration - A71 Administration - A71 Sequence for Section 3 - AA72 1. Prepare the Material for Evaluating Section 3A - A73 1.1. For a Visual Support in OBJ Form - A73 1.2. For Other Visual Support Forms - A75 2. Demonstrations, Evaluation, and Scoring - A78 2.1. Detailed Procedure for Subsection 3A.1 - A80 2.2. Detailed Procedure for Subsection 3A.2 - A84 2.3. Detailed Procedure for Subsection 3A.3 - A88 Sequence for Section 3B - A90 1. Identify the Visual Support Form, the Category, and the Type of Schedule Being Evaluated - A92 2. Prepare the Material for Evaluating Section 3B - A92 3. Demonstrations, Evaluation, and Scoring - A97 3.1. Detailed Procedure for Subsection 3B.1 - A100 3.2. Detailed Procedure for Subsection 3B.2 - A102 4. Scoring Part 3 in the Evaluation Protocol - A104 Part 4 - A107 Goal - A107 Duration - A107 Administration - A107 Sequence - A108 1. Detailed Procedure for Section 4A: Identifying the Schedule with a Cue That Relates to the User’s Interests - A108 2. Detailed Procedure for Section 4B: Finding an Individualized Location - A109 3. Detailed Procedure for Section 4C: Schedule Content (Activities and Representative Visual Supports) - A110 Recommendations Report Schedule Characteristics - A117 Schedule Content - A119 Procedures to Follow - A121 Comments and Signature - A121 Schedule Adjustment Protocol Use the Adjustment Protocol to Modify These Seven Characteristics - A126 Schedule Adjustment Sequence - A127 Material Required for the Adjustment - A127 Administration - A127 Part 1 - A127 A. Identify If the Adjustment’s Prerequisites Are Met - A128 B. Evaluate the Level of Independence for the Current Schedule - A128 C. Identify the Characteristics to Adjust - A128 Part 2 - A131 Adjustment Prerequisites - A131 Adjustment Benefits - A132 Pre-Evaluation - A132 Introduction and Evaluation Phases - A132 Recommendations Report - A134 Pre-Experimental Results - A137 Bibliography - A141 Supplementary Material: Schedule Evaluation Tool
Nathalie Poirier (Author) Dr. Nathalie Poirier is a psychologist, neuropsychologist, full professor and researcher in the Department of Psychology at the University of Québec at Montréal where she directs the Research Laboratory on the Families of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Her research projects focus on the quality of life of parents of children with ASD. She is the co-author of several books on autism and received the OSER INNOVER award for the OUEST tool. Johanne Mainville (Author) Johanne Mainville, M.Ps., is a clinical psychologist in private practice, where she works with individuals with autism spectrum disorders and their families, and a consultant for the Service Québécois d'Expertise en Troubles Graves du Comportement (SQETGC). Nathalie Plante (Author) Nathalie Plante works as a regional support officer for students with ASD for the French school boards in the Montreal area. She supports the development of projects that contribute to the academic success of students with ASD. She is also a certified TEACCH® consultant from the University of North Carolina and is very involved in the deployment of this approach in Quebec. Sonia Di Lillo (Author) Sonia Di Lillo B.Sc. has worked for approximately 20 years as a clinical activities specialist in the health and social services network. Her expertise is the support of teams working with people with severe behavioral disorders (SBD). She now devotes herself entirely to teaching and supervision in the Special Education Techniques Department of the Cégep du Vieux-Montréal.
Reviews for Creating Visual Schedules: The Schedule Evaluation Tool (SET) for People with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disabilities
"L'ouest est utile pour le plan d'intervention, car il permet de d�terminer rapidement et ad�quatement le type d'horaire visuel adapt� aux besoins, aux go�ts et aux int�r�ts de la personne accompagn�e. Il lui permet de mieux comprendre et de mieux communiquer avec son environnement. Ultimement, l'ouest favorise, par le biais de l'individualisation, le d�veloppement du sentiment de comp�tence et une meilleure autonomie, �tant donn� que la personne accompagn�e a besoin de moins d'aide ext�rieure gr�ce � l'horaire �tabli. Enfin, de fa�on plus g�n�rale, une routine ad�quate et un horaire adapt� pr�sentent plusieurs avantages sur le plan de la concentration, de la gestion des �motions et de la r�duction des rigidit�s face aux impr�vus et de l'anxi�t� associ�e aux nouvelles situations, car ils permettent de donner des rep�res � la personne. https: //cote-a-cote-inclusion.com/outils/ouest-outil-devaluation-des-structures-du-temps/ --C�te � c�te: donn�es probantes pour une soci�t� inclusive ""C�te � c�te: donn�es probantes pour une soci�t� inclusive"""
