Conservatorship

A heartbreakingly insightful ethnographic deep dive into the failure of mental health care in the United States that everyone refuses to pay for—and for which no public authority takes responsibility. Barnard strategically takes us through each dysfunctional interstice of California’s iconically mismanaged mental health system that manages to maximize costs, minimizes benefits, and tortures everyone involved—especially people with psychosis spectrum disorders whose lives are cut short by the public/private bureaucratic quagmire that has been waging war on itself for the past half century. -- Philippe Bourgois, author of <i>In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio</i> and co-author of <i>Righteous Dopefiend</i> Vivid case studies and probing interviews humanize this journey through the fraught terrain of involuntary care. Barnard pulls few punches in describing the more offensive stretches of the roadmap but avoids veering into unalloyed condemnation or praise. His thoughtful exploration yields reasons for hope that our better angels might prevail. -- Roderick Shaner, MD, former medical director of the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health The subject and title of Conservatorship is perhaps the most important yet least studied power of domestic governance. As Alex Barnard's meticulous study of California’s system for protecting those most disabled by mental illness shows, this power is left to a largely unaccountable and invisible system of local and market actors. At a time of much interest in new legal solutions to our severe crisis of unhoused, untreated, and mentally ill citizens, Barnard’s findings suggest the priority of addressing our even deeper crisis of authority. -- Jonathan Simon, author of <i>Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear</i> In California, the state has abdicated its authority over the conservatorship process by delegating state functions to a fragmented field of actors. Cutting through overly simplistic accounts of conservatorship, Barnard uses rich data and sharp theory to delve into the pitfalls of this abdication of authority. -- Josh Seim, author of <i>Bandage, Sort, and Hustle: Ambulance Crews on the Front Lines of Urban Suffering</i> Conservatorship delivers the kind of critical analysis that...would require California politicians, more comfortable with increasing budgets than investigating outcomes, to expose themselves to more blame. * City Journal * I recommend this very comprehensive book to anyone who is interested and ultimately frustrated by how our state has failed so many it purports a desire to help. * Southern California Psychiatrist * It is rare that a book saturated in ambivalence and complexity is so eminently readable and insightful. Barnard has at least two gifts that serve him well. He writes well and he narrates with unfailing empathy. This is a significant accomplishment, especially for the topic....In an ethnography executed with such skill, Barnard’s insistence that the state assume more responsibility over conservatorship—even to the point of expanding it—is a persuasive argument and not simply an exhortation. As tempting as it may be, Barnard never abdicates his responsibility as a judicious social scientist. Gimme more. * Social Forces * This study analyzes the fraught relationship between law, medicine, and government that too often produces a mental health system with deadly results...Highly recommended. * Choice * A herculean effort to examine the enormous complexities of California’s failing mental health system while offering helpful suggestions for ethically improving outcomes for the most desperately needy individuals suffering from severe mental illnesses. * Contemporary Sociology * Enables us to rethink the kinds of failures our current mental health arrangements produce. For this reason, it is one of the most important books in on mental health published this millennium. * Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry *