Ballistic-Missile Defence and Strategic Stability

Dean A. Wilkening

$52.99

Paperback

Not in-store but you can order this
How long will it take?

Availability Information

We source books from suppliers in Australia and overseas. For books we don't currently have in stock, the time it takes to get them from our suppliers can vary widely - from a few days to a few months - so we check each book with each supplier to determine the expected time it will take to be supplied to us.

We then advise you accordingly. If the time taken to get any book is too long for you, you can let us know and we will cancel or adjust your order, and refund as required.

To find out the anticipated arrival time for specific items prior to ordering, please contact us by phone or email:

Phone +61 2 9264 3111, or 1800 4 BOOKS (1800 4 26657) if outside Sydney:
option 1 Abbey's Bookshop (Crime, History, Science, Kids & more) • info@abbeys.com.au
option 2 Language Book Centre (ESL & Foreign Languages) • language@abbeys.com.au
option 3 Galaxy Bookshop (Sci-fi, Fantasy, Romance, Graphic Novels) • sf@galaxybooks.com.au

QTY:

English

Oxford University Press Inc
01 June 2000

Arms negotiation & control; Defence strategy, planning & research; Nuclear weapons

Series: Adelphi series

The US debate surrounding ballistic-missile defence is becoming increasingly polarised: advocates claim that these defences are essential to US security and should be deployed as soon as possible; critics argue that they upset strategic stability, encourage regional arms races, and therefore, will not work. What is lacking in the current debate is a quantitative analysis of how well defences would have to work to meet specific security objectives, and what level of defence might upset strategic stability. This paper argues that there is no immediate need to deploy US national missile defences because accidental or unauthorised Russian or Chinese attacks are unlikely, and because deterrence should mean that the risk of attack from emerging ballistic-missile states is acceptably low. National missile defence might be a useful insurance, but other defence needs are more pressing. However, if the US did deploy such a system, a modified Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty that allowed the US and Russia to deploy 100 interceptors at multiple sites around their territory should not pose a realistic threat to the retaliatory capabilities of four of the five declared nuclear powers. A 100-interceptor system would, however, eliminate China's current strategic retaliatory capability against the US. The proliferation of theatre-range ballistic missiles is a more pressing problem. It is not clear that current theatre systems can achieve the necessary levels of performance in the presence of potential countermeasures. Relatively few effective countermeasures exist against airborne boost-phase systems. These may be a more fruitful alternative, not least because they pose very little threat to the strategic forces of the five major nuclear powers. They may therefore provide the most effective theatre missile defence, without upsetting strategic stability.

By: Dean A. Wilkening
Imprint: Oxford University Press Inc
Country of Publication: United States
Volume: No.334
Dimensions: Height: 234mm, Width: 156mm, Spine: 6mm
Weight: 498g
ISBN: 9780199290048
ISBN 10: 0199290040
Series: Adelphi series
Pages: 96
Publication Date: 01 June 2000
Audience: College/higher education , General/trade , Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly , Primary , ELT Advanced
Format: Paperback
Publisher's Status: Out of Print

Introduction; Chapter 1 Ballistic-Missile Proliferation; Chapter 2 National Missile Defence; Chapter 3 Theatre-Missile Defence; Chapter 4 Boost-Phase Ballistic-Missile Defence; Conclusion;

Authored by Wilkening, Dean A.