About two-thirds of Americans support legal abortion in many or all circumstances, and this group finds itself a frustrated majority following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization which overturned the legal precedent set in Roe v. Wade. Previous scholarship argues intense minorities can secure favorable policy outcomes when facing off against a more diffuse and less motivated majority, creating incongruence between public opinion and policy. This Element focuses on the ways that preference intensity and partisan polarization have contributed to the current policy landscape surrounding abortion rights. Using survey data from the American National Election Studies, the authors identify Americans with intense preferences about abortion and investigate the role they play in electoral politics. They observe a shift in the relationship between partisanship and preference intensity coinciding with Dobbs and speculate about what this means for elections and policy congruence in the future.
1. Frustrated Majorities, Intense Minorities, and Abortion Policy; 2. A Brief History of Abortion Rights in America; 3. State Variation in Abortion Policy Post-Dobbs; 4. Abortion Attitudes and Partisanship in the American Electorate; 5. Preference Intensity and Abortion-Focused Americans; 6. Abortion Focus and Polarization; 7. Electoral Politics Post-Dobbs.
