In this book, essayist and palaeontologist Stephen Jay Gould describes and defends the 'NOMA Principle' in an attempt to resolve what he sees as the illusory conflict between science and religion. The term is a contraction of the phrase 'Non-Overlapping Magisteria', which enlarges a concept familiar to students of the philosophy of science - you can't use the tools from one sphere of inquiry to unearth meaningful information about another. A magisterium, defined in the Preamble as 'a domain where one form of teaching holds the appropriate tools for meaningful discourse and resolution', is a self-contained area of exploration with its own terms and rules: Gould argues that science and religion are two such magisteria, the natural world being the domain of science, and the moral world the stamping ground of religion. He presents his argument clearly and forcibly, drawing in the process on famous events and figures from the history of both disciplines. Gould delights in pointing up the marginality of so-called staple instances of science at war with religion - the flat earth myth, we find, is just that: an apocryphal tale which gained a sudden currency in the wake of 19th-century populist fervour - and does so with his customarily sparky conversational tone. He has the gift of making his reader think: he never lauds his obvious intelligence and speaks simply and passionately. Aside from a brief descent into witheringly sarcastic creationist-bashing, all angles of the science/religion quandary are treated sympathetically before being shown to be symptomatic of one great misconception: science and religion as warring factions, rather than independent, respectfully coexistent, fields of investigation concerned with separate areas of human existence. Entertaining and convincing stuff. (Kirkus UK)