After Piketty

Piketty's work did what decades of rising disparities couldn't do: it reminded macroeconomists that inequality matters. More starkly, it laid bare just how ill-equipped our existing frameworks are for understanding, predicting, and changing inequality. This extraordinary collection shows that our most nimble social scientists are responding to the challenge, collecting ideas about capital, technology, power, gender, race, and privilege that might help inform a broader understanding.--Justin Wolfers, University of Michigan The book, edited by economists Heather Boushey, J. Bradford Delong and Marshall Steinbaum, is more interesting than the original. It benefits from having 21 essays on different inequality--related topics. As Piketty says in his gracious response, included at the end of this 660--page volume, the many authors bring a welcome breadth of expertise...Piketty's commentators raise more questions than they answer, but they are important questions about a significant social challenge.-- (05/12/2017) The topics discussed in the book affect all citizens. High inequality should concern everyone because it is a moral, social and political issue.-- (09/18/2017) [Boushey, DeLong, and Steinbaum] have curated an impressive set of essays responding to Piketty's work...Among them are deep dives into the assumptions underlying Piketty's predictions, historical accounts of the role of slavery and gender in capitalist systems, and considerations of the relationship between concentrated wealth and political power. The essays put Piketty's arguments into a broad historical and intellectual context and highlight some noteworthy omissions that call into question his book's most dire predictions. At the end of the volume, Piketty himself weighs in. The result is an intellectual excursion of a kind rarely offered by modern economics.-- (11/01/2017) Unusually for such a large and varied collection, almost all the papers are worth reading. They repeat themselves rarely; they examine multiple different perspectives; and most of them are well and conservatively argued...[Piketty's concluding essay] is written with great attention to criticism and humility about his conclusions. In it, Piketty insists that [Capital in the Twenty-First Century's] purpose was to start a conversation. By the evidence of his concluding essay, and the book in general, that conversation is well underway.-- (08/16/2017) Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century forcibly entered the public imagination in 2014, but the book's impact on academic thinking and research is only just starting to be felt. The essays in After Piketty offer new findings and admirably lay out an agenda that will influence future research on inequality, opportunity, and measurement for years to come.--Miles Corak, University of Ottawa The essays in After Piketty are impressively diverse, not only in their subject matter but also in the way they relate to Piketty's original text. Several launch straightforward critiques of his work--both of what he has done and what he has failed to do--while others present complementary ideas that aim to enrich his arguments.-- (01/05/2017) The book serves as a fantastic introduction to Piketty's main argument in Capital [in the Twenty-First Century], and to some of the main criticisms, including doubt that his key equation--r > g, showing that returns on capital grow faster than the economy--will hold true in the long run. It also contains thoughtful interventions in debates about the political economy of inequality.-- (03/16/2017) Heather Boushey, Brad DeLong, and Marshall Steinbaum have convened and shaped an ambitious and refreshingly frank conversation about Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century. This extraordinary gathering of two dozen authors--working across disciplinary boundaries--interrogates Piketty's core claims about the causes, correlates, characteristics, and consequences of high and rising levels of income and wealth inequality in the West. The gathered authors celebrate and hone Capital's far-reaching contributions; they also tackle substantial weaknesses and assess omissions. Readers unfamiliar with Capital will find an accessible synthesis, graduates of the original book will emerge with a more nuanced understanding, and inequality scholars--newcomers and veterans--will revise their research agendas.--Janet C. Gornick, Professor of Political Science and Sociology, Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York