Larry Shapiro is professor of philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is the author of The Mind Incarnate (2004), Zen and the Art of Running: The Path to Making Peace with Your Pace (2009), and Embodied Cognition (2011), and the editor of Arguing About the Mind (2007) and The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition (2014).
The Miracle Myth is an extremely impressive book. It is beautifully written, engaging yet philosophically sophisticated, and offers a novel perspective on the question of how to assess the reliability of accounts of miracles. Even those of us who remain convinced that the evidence for miracles is compelling will find plenty to think about in Shapiro's arguments. -- David A. Skeel, author of True Paradox: How Christianity Makes Sense of Our Complex World The Miracle Myth is an exceptionally clear book on a controversial and interesting topic. -- Michael P. Lynch, author of The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data Shapiro does more than hammer some more nails in the coffin of miracles that David Hume fashioned. He marshals much of what we have learned about inference to the best explanation and Bayes's theorem in the 270 years since Hume's inquiry. Yet he does it with Hume's lightness of touch, a wealth of relevant examples of contemporary credulousness, and no equations. It is a book to enjoy and then pass on to friends given to wishful thinking. -- Alex Rosenberg, author of The Atheist's Guide to Reality: Enjoying Life Without Illusions Most people, at least in the United States, believe in miracles. But should they? In this easy to read and often witty book the philosopher Shapiro demonstrates that there is no scientific or logical justification for doing so. I suspect that The Miracle Myth will convert few true believers, but even they should benefit from reading it. -- Ronald L. Numbers, author of The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design Shapiro makes a clear argument, which allows us-believers or not-to examine critically our own positions. Library Journal