In Jesus and the Chaos of History, James Crossley looks at the way the earliest traditions about Jesus interacted with a context of social upheaval and the ways in which this historical chaos of the early first century led to a range of ideas which were taken up, modified, ignored, and reinterpreted in the movement that followed.
Crossley examines how the earliest Palestinian tradition intersected with social upheaval and historical change and how accidental, purposeful, discontinuous, contradictory, and implicit meanings in the developments of ideas appeared in the movement that followed. He considers the ways seemingly egalitarian and countercultural ideas co-exist with ideas of dominance and power and how human reactions to socio-economic inequalities can end up mimicking dominant power. In this case, the book analyses how a Galilean 'protest' movement laid the foundations for its own brand of imperial rule. This evaluation is carried out in detailed studies on the kingdom of God and 'Christology', 'sinners' and purity, and gender and revolution.
Introduction ; 1. Does Jesus Plus Paul Equal Marx Plus Lenin? Re-directing the Historical Jesus ; 2. Criteria, Historicity, and the Earliest Palestinian Tradition ; 3. Empire of God, King of Rome: Kingdom and Christology ; 4. 'Sinners', Law, and Purity ; 5. Camping with Jesus? Gender, Revolution, and Early Palestinian Tradition ; An Irrelevant Conclusion
James Crossley is Professor of Bible, Culture and Politics at the University of Sheffield. His research focuses on both Christian origins and contemporary receptions of the Bible and how they both related to contexts of historical change. His is author of numerous articles and books, including Jesus in an Age of Neoliberalism: Quests, Scholarship and Ideology (Acumen, 2012).
Reviews for Jesus and the Chaos of History: Redirecting the Life of the Historical Jesus
this thought-provoking volume oVers several significant contributions to the quest for the historical Jesus and is definitely worth reading and pondering * Brant Pitre, Journal of Theological Studies *
